Read the attached Case study: Google’s Handling of the Echo Chamber Manifesto and answer the attached questions

150 words per question

– Essay Answers | www.essayanswers.org

Change the formula of the answer only, so it is not be the same.

Question 1

The type of evaluation system used in this case is the ranking method. The ranking method of the evaluation process is centered around the performance of employees. Employees working for an organization that uses the ranking method are put against each other (Boxall and Purcell, 2016).

After the ranking, the highest performing employees are rewarded for their performance, lower-performing employees are rewarded in relatively lower scales. In contrast, lower- performing employees are relieved of their duties or not rewarded at all (Boxall and Purcell, 2016).

In the evaluation, if a group has ten employees, the performance of the 1st employee is compared with the performance of the 10th, followed by a comparison of the 2nd employee and the 10th employee all through until all the employees have been compared to the one focal employee in question (Boxall and Purcell, 2016).

Question 2

One of the significant effects that the Rank and yank effect has on managers is guilt. A manager is likely to suffer from guilt owing to the number of employees who lose their jobs due to the manager’s low recommendations. In case of prolonged guilt, the manager may be depressed if they are unable to get over the thought of an employee has lost their job due to the recommendations they have given and the resultant effects on the employees’ family (Hook and Jenkins, 2019).

According to Hook and Jenkins (2019), one of the most notable effects of guilt is insomnia. Lack of sleep may directly lead to a reduction in the productivity of the managers. Hook and Jenkins, (2019), further state that one of the main side-effects of insomnia is a reduction in the psychomotor capabilities and consolidation of memory.

Additionally, guilt may also lead to a loss of appetite, and resultantly cause the mangers to underperform in their daily duties. Hook and Jenkins (2019), state that sugar is an important element in people and has a direct impact on the ability of a person to perform optimally and make sound decisions. Consequently, the managers are likely to make poor decisions that may affect the organization adversely.

Question 3

The system does not reward employees based on the value they contribute to the organization as a whole but rather on the numbers they bring to the organization. The employees are more inclined towards closing the sale and adding the numbers than deliver the expected experience through the beliefs of the organizations.

Moreover, the rank and yank system can have devastating effects on the employees’ morale. According to Ivancevich and Konopaske, (2013), one of the primary goals of performance appraisals is to reward employees and motivate them to perform better leading to higher productivity and profit margins for the company as a whole. However, since the rank and yank system only recognize’s limited sections of employees and disregards the lowest, the lowest-performing employee is likely to be discouraged as they feel that their efforts are not appreciated. Thus, employees might lack morale to do more and achieve better results and, in worst-case scenarios, might choose to leave the organization.

Question 4

For a better performance appraisal system, the organization should embrace modern performance appraisal methods such as the 360-degree assessment method. In this method, the employee being assessed receives meaningful feedback from fellow employees on matters related to their work ethic. The evaluation process is aimed at assessing various social, networking, teamwork, and productivity skills (Ivancevich and Konopaske, 2013).

The performance of the employees is further analysed and meaningful conclusions made of the outcome. If the employee is found to be performing well, he or she is rewarded, and if their performance is not optimal, they are warned and taken through counselling. The

quality of their performance can be arrived at based on the feedback of employees within the same team (Ivancevich and Konopaske, 2013).

Additionally, the 360-degree approach also enables managers to identify existing gaps in the competitiveness of the workforce. The employees are then selected and scheduled for training and development programs, which will further better their performance in their respective roles and responsibilities at work (Ivancevich and Konopaske, 2013).

Furthermore, the 360-degree feedback, also known as the multi-rater system, is based on various sources as opposed to feedback from one manager. Thus, the system eradicates erroneous data, which might result from having a single source of data for the analyses. Consequently, the human resource office is better positioned to make informed decisions over the employees (Ivancevich and Konopaske, 2013).

Using Descartes and Locke, explain how their theories impact what counts as knowledge. How is knowledge established and under what circumstances, if any, can we claim certainty? How does this relate to the understanding of logic and argumentation in the first unit?

Once you have completed your initial post, read and respond to the posts of at least 2 of your peers. Your initial post and your peer responses should be substantive (well thought out and logically organized) and original (do not copy and paste). Also, check the course calendar for discussion due dates.

THIS IS FOR POST AND 2 REPLIES !!

Research Summary

Research in the workplace solves problems. Tasked with a significant problem, you may be asked gather the information necessary to fully understand the issue at hand, solve that problem (or offer potential solutions), prove that your solutions are viable, and/or test your solution(s). Doing this work requires different types of research that go beyond simply querying a library database or using Google. You will often need to speak directly to target populations and audiences, and directly contact resources and experts in different professions and in the community. Local and national journalism may add context and perspective. Professional experts, government agencies, state and local authorities all may be relevant sources, as are individuals in target populations. Essentially, research in the workplace requires you to think critically and creatively about

• The type of information you need; and
• The best way to get that information.

Your job is to address, explain, and/or solve a problem using the most relevant and applicable methods and resources. If a resource can supply information you need, then it is the right resource for the job.

It’s also important when thinking about a problem you’re researching to keep in mind that you probably aren’t the first person or organization to deal with this issue. Look at other organizations, groups, or communities negotiating the same or similar issue. Research how those groups describe and deal with the problem. The perspective of experience is invaluable to your work. If your solution closely resembles another organization’s, it might mean that’s the most effective solution.

Assignment

This project asks your team to do workplace research into a local problem impacting the USF community (which you can define however you like). Your overall goal is to describe the problem in detail using as much information as you can gather from as many different sources as are useful and begin to explore potential solutions. That means you are looking at research gathered by others (e.g., government agencies, non-profit organizations, professional and academic experts), but also you might gather your own data by contacting experts and asking impacted populations for their perspective. You will produce a memo that reports your findings, giving readers a robust understanding of the problem you have researched and some of the possible solutions.

This memo should adhere to a professional memo format and will probably run 500 to 1,000 words. There is no particular citation format required, but please be consistent with whichever format you use.

Remember that this is a summary. Summarize what you know and how you know it. You will be adding much more detail to this research in the recommendation report itself.

How much research is enough? Think about it this way. Your team has a certain amount of time before this memo is due. Within that timeframe, you all have other obligations. How much research can you reasonably do in that time? How much research will help your team in the next project deliverables? That’s how much research you should shoot for.

*** important***

1-in case to know what is our topic, there will be a file uploaded talks about our team charter.

2- from the file that will be uploaded, you can choose the easiest topic you can talk about because we are going to order the following assignment for this project from you if you do not mind.

3- the topics are here:

1. Library room capacity.
   1. Why it is important: it affects the student’s quality of education
   2. Possible solutions: occupy less dense area
2. Traffic lights time.
   1. Why it is important: it impacts how quickly people get to class.
   2. Possible solutions: Reduce traffic light times.
3. Buses efficiency.
   1. Why it is important: Students who rely on busses to get to campus.
   2. Possible solutions: Offering bigger busses, or more busses.
   ** note** ALL TOPIC ARE RELATED TO UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA.