I want to write a research paper in which you describe and develop a literature map of the research studies on the cybersecurity topic (Protect Individuals Account And Email)

1-interdiction

2-conclusion

3-Literature Map

4-Peer-reviewed references identified

The 5-Your graphic should include lines from the proposed study to branches of studies on the map so that a reader can easily see how yours will extend existing literature.

6- 2-page report (12 point font, 1-inch margin all around)

7-You can use these links

https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2016/12/21/…

https://www.thebalance.com/how-to-protect-your-acc…

https://www.pcmag.com/news/why-you-need-to-protect…

– Essay Answers | www.essayanswers.org

I would like you to respond to the 2 part documentary titled “The Facebook Dilemma.” In addition, I would like you to address/discuss the three articles that discuss Facebook and Twitter’s relationship with Coronavirus disinformation.

What are you taking away from the documentary? What aspects of the documentary stuck out to you? Which parts forced you to question ideas that you never previously questioned? Understanding that Facebook is now a social medium for a particular age demographic, yet still remains the world’s widely used platform, in your view what kind of power does it hold in shaping people’s ways of thinking and seeing the world, and more specifically, during our current state of affairs.

okay so the paper is about a book or a chapter It talks about free speech and diversity. the paper should be about researching arguments that was presented on the book:

• The onion may possibly be true
• He who knows only his own side of the case
• conflicting doctrines share the truth between them

so basically explain what he trying to say in each argument which he already rights about and try to expand on that by agreeing or not agreeing with what he said ” i prefer agreeing” ,and try to use academic sources. also you can try to connect free speech and diversity as to use it in marketing major

ideally one page per argument and one to connect it with the marketing major so lets say at least 3 pages and half

the reading

CASE STUDY: for unit 2 – Chapter 3 Pg 57 Edmontons Walterdale Bridge by Heather Stewart and Paul R. Messinger

For each Assignment part you will be required to analyze one or more of the case studies assigned in the reading. Case studies give students a sense of reality that few classroom exercises can equal. The format for the analysis of the case studies will vary somewhat from case to case depending upon the circumstances and content of the individual case itself. You will have to decide how to best approach your analysis of the cases and questions presented. Length of your case study analysis will naturally vary depending on complexity and variables of the case. Generally, most cases can be covered in three pages, typed double spaced in Times New Roman, using a 12 font. Below is an outline that I would like you to follow when you do your case study. This format makes it easy for you to do your analysis and makes it easier for me to correct. There are five (5) topics outlined below for you to follow. Each study will begin with a Problem and end with a solution. The best way is to analysis each topic as it relates to your case using it as a title, then give your explanation for that title. Place in the appropriate area.

The Problem
Central issue/facts: a few sentences/paragraphs characterizing the central theme of the case study. Avoid restatements. Use your own words to systematically apprise the reader about the problem(s). Why is the case significant?

The History

Alternatives
Alternatives for solving the problem: What other actions/decisions might have been possible that would have changed the outcome? Where any of these alternatives considered but not acted on?

Specific Concepts
Tie the case into specific theoretical concepts under review: What central problems and dilemmas for the field does it emphasize? What answers, if any, does it provide to the precise theoretical questions being addressed?

Solution
Conclusion/lessons for future administrators: What was the outcome of the case? What could be learned from the events and actions of the case itself that may apply to future, but different circumstances? Is the case only providing lessons applicable to that specific instance, or are their larger lessons that can be adopted in a broader context? If so, which ones?