Min of 300 words

• After watching both videos in the content area:
• The future of Money
• Discuss how you see the future with the middle man?
• Discuss how you see the future of money?

– Essay Answers | www.essayanswers.org

Please use the file attached to complete the assignment

Write an essay about one piece of STAGE classical music (Ballets, Operas, or Musicals only) of at least 500 words of content (headings do not count). Your chosen piece should be longer than 15 minutes. The essay should have a brief biography of the composer and an extensive feature about the composition. Use what we’ve learned in class to help your essay: melody, harmony, rhythm, texture, etc. Also tell me how the music makes you feel. Music is usually about emotions and I want to know how it personally affects you. Essays with longer sections about the composer than the composition will suffer in grade. Wikipedia is not allowed. Use the textbook or any other reliable source such as books, ebooks, podcasts, and I will allow youtube lectures but it must be cited in the paper so that I can make sure you did not write it word for word.

Please use correct grammar and essay structure. Introduction, content, conclusion, and a reference page. And don’t call a piece a “song,” say piece, composition, or call it by its name (symphony, ballet, opera, etc.)

Task1:Describe the importance of Financial Management in delivery a quality technical service department. 3 paragraphs are sufficient.

Task2:word:500(attached textbook)

• CHAPTER SUMMARY: Summarize chapter presented during the week. Identify the main point (as in “What’s your point?”), thesis, or conclusion of the key ideas presented in the chapter.
• SUPPORT: Do research outside of the book and demonstrate that you have in a very obvious way. This refers to research beyond the material presented in the textbook. Show something you have discovered from your own research. Be sure this is obvious and adds value beyond what is contained in the chapter itself.
• EVALUATION: Apply the concepts from the appropriate chapter. Hint: Be sure to use specific terms and models directly from the textbook in analyzing the material presented and include the page in the citation.
• SOURCES: Include citations with your sources. Use APA style citations and references.

Task3 :please provide replies for below student posts each in 150.

krupa-1. What should Mark have done if Jack was still not able to solve the problem?

The material examination on McRoy Aerospace, one of the essential errand association limits has been illuminated with the Jack and Mark condition. Trust is the essential perspective one must do expand mate. Jack was responsible for understanding issues happens amidst assignments and it was by two or three techniques not executable for him (Kerzner, 2013).

Agreeing Mark, Jack was really a potential contender to execute the meander and he will give his industry seeing which ought to be conceivable the errand. The considering was to have a course of action B on the off chance that anything turns out really. On the off chance that there is any key model using which he can re-try the structure. In the occasion that Jack can’t examine the issues, by then Mark must think about any framework or some astonishing decisions, for instance, giving over the endeavor to any of potential the undertaking mates. He can have a honest to goodness social affair to convey new plans to make new missing and an entire session to comprehend the market and how to take off fundamental changes.

2. Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now after Jack could not solve the problem the second time around?

In the wake of reasoning about the entire circumstance, Mark could go for any potential undertaking enhancement inside the breeze that has information. Another choice he could go for any health who holds a phenomenal measure of industry learning and who can oblige with the current hurried condition. Affirm apparent on the likelihood that anybody could fulfill this undertaking it would be Jack and if Jack was not set up to consider anything then it wasn’t possible (Bisk, 2018).

Since it was fundamental for a response for being found, it would have been imperative for the issue to be apportioned to someone else if Jack did not make sense of how to light up it for the second-time round. Making a supposition that Jack was the only a solitary with the potential and deserting it at that even after he couldn’t get the course of action would possible rush out various musings possible from different people. The association would in this way fight with the issue and secure hardships. In any case, if jack would have been remarkable deal with the issue the second time, endeavoring more people would be an opportunity to find a solution. It along these lines looks good.

kethana-1. What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem?

In my view, mark has to provide some time for Jack to resolve the problem. He should explore all the skillets of Jack and he has to check with Jack for any of the problems that he has facing to complete the project. Mark has to check with jack for the support that he has to get with the other colleagues who can help in completing the project. Also, the mark has to choose one of his teammates as an alternative resource for Jack who can complete the project. His team mate has to find some other technique that jack has not yet found to solve the problem. The problem should be divided into some different small groups such that it can be solved by all the team and combine them to find the solution.

2. Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now after jack could not solve the problem the second time around?

No, it doesn’t make sense for assigning the problem to someone else after jack could not solve the problem the second time around because it will be very late for mark to give a chance to someone else to find the solution to the problem. Mark believed that jack is a very efficient person who can solve the problem and no one can solve as efficiently as jack. If Mark allows assigning the problem to the third person to solve, then it would take a longer time to understand the initial analysis of the problem and find a solution to solve it. If mark was supportive to jack for completing the project by providing some suggestions.